Signatories

  • Nationalist Alternative
  • Australia First Party

We the above signed declare:

The basis of our political activity is our inviolable commitment to nationalism within the framework of the white Western European civilisation, which sprang from the Holy Roman Empire, founded in Europe, and which now extends across the entire world – from Europe to the new world in North America, Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, South Africa and the former Rhodesia; from the East, West, South and North of Europe.

We declare that, since the time of its founding, the white Western civilisation and Judaism have found themselves in opposition: there are no “Judeo-Christian” values any more than there are “Islamo-Christian” values.

We declare, that, after the overcoming of the totalitarian systems of the 20th century, the white Western people currently faces a new global totalitarian threat: multiracialism.

The core issue we face is the survival of our own race of people, of exposing and ending the program of genocide against Whites by means of mass immigration and assimilation, Liberal ideology and Political Correctness. We affirm the right of Whites to be able to preserve their race within white nations. We recognise that this is the main struggle that we face, and we recognise that we are bound by loyalty to our race and our posterity to secure our own survival and sovereignty.

We reject multiracialism, which leads to whites becoming minorities in their homelands, whites becoming minorities in cities such as Paris, Rome, Brussels, Amsterdam, Stockholm, Sydney, Melbourne, Los Angeles, London, whites becoming displaced by immigrants from Africa, India, China and the Muslim world.

We reject Zionism, which is a fundamentalist Jewish-political-imperialist creed. The ideology of the State of Israel, and the ideology of the Holocaust – which has become the leading religion of the West, i.e., the one everyone believes in – owe their origin to Judaist, Talmudic and Semitic creeds which historically have been antithetical to the continued interests of white people, white European culture, history, tradition, spirit and religion. Even today, liberal Jewish intellectuals preach the slow culture-death – the down-going of the white man through forced multiracialism and multiculturalism, mass non-white immigration and assimilation which is against the will of the white Western peoples. At the same time, these intellectuals – and the Jewish political leaders and the self-appointed Jewish “community leaders” – strive to keep Jewish traditions intact, the Jewish ethnic group pure, and their State of Israel free of non-Jewish immigrants who come to Israel from the Arab and African world.

Far Right opportunistic, reactionary and populist outfits have sprung up, sometimes within a very short space of time; they have taken the racial crisis which the White peoples of the world are facing, and turned it into an purely ideological and non-racial struggle against Islam. Some of the outfits in question – Geert Wilders’ Freedom Party (Holland), the Freedom Party of Austria, the Flemish Vlaams Belang Party and the Swedish Democrats – signed a joint statement, the ‘Jerusalem Declaration’, professing their support for pro-Semitism, in Jerusalem in December 2011.

They support Israel and Zionism. But Diaspora Jewish intellectuals and “community leaders” are notorious for using their political power to have Western nationalists smeared, persecuted, fined and imprisoned. The Western nationalist groups who support Israel’s “right to exist” and deplore Islamism while never criticising Judaism – these groups are trying to buy protection from any Jewish blackmailers and persecutors. The aim is to present a happy face to liberal whites: ‘You see, we are friendly with the Jews, please love us’.

The Islamic threat to Western Culture, Traditions and Peoples exists because of Liberalism, because of a policy of multiracialism. We recognise that it is not the Islamic world which is ultimately responsible for the threat of Islamism in the West, but Liberalism which sponsored, and still actively protects, Islam in the west, and enables the Islamisation of urban population centers in Europe and the driving out of whites.

We, the undersigned, accept our rejection from any liberal whites who acquiesce in the slow death of the white Western peoples through mass non-white immigration; we accept our rejection by liberal Jewish intellectuals and “community leaders”; we accept our rejection by the liberal establishment. We reject the idea that the future of the West is somehow tied in any way with Israel. We do not aim to please any of these groups, instead, we strive to do what is right. We are fighting to reclaim the lands of the West and ensure the survival and self-determination of our people. We shall not stop until victory is assured and secured.

 

 

21 Responses to The Anti-Jerusalem Declaration

  1. Osred says:

    The Odinist Movement
    a 1930s pamphlet by A. Rud Mills
    © Odinic Rite of Australia, 2013

    I. – A group has formed for the commencing of an Odinist Society. An Odinist is not a Christian.
    II. – Christianity (the basis of our culture) has failed. See Ancient Rome, Spain, United States of America and other nations. It fails, too, in other than national aspects.
    III. – Odinism shows the Great One as just and good, not as mean and bloodthirsty.
    IV. – Christianity seeks to substitute an Eastern outlook in place of our one native outlook.
    V. – Odinists reverence their own race and its father-spirit.
    VI. – If race “A”, untrue to its own spirit, worships (with or without Self-renunciation as its ideal) another race “B”, then race “A” will decay, and before its death will be ruled by the members of race “B”
    VII. – Differences of race evidently exist for divine purpose or expression. There are, in different degree, divisions and differences in the animal and plant worlds.
    VIII. – Christianity seeks to destroy race. May not this be as serious as the killing of an individual?
    IX. – The minds and outlooks of different men are in large degree expressed in their physical appearance and that of their forefathers.
    X. – Our own racial ideals and traditions (not those of another) are our best guide to health and national strength.
    XI. – The causes of the threatened extinction of our race, the economic unsoundness, the instinctive fear of today, can be traced to their origin. The real remedy is a spiritual one.
    XII. – About Odinism: –

    (a) Odin (put briefly) is the part of the Great One of whom man can be aware in some degree.
    (b) Odinists recognise race as an inescapable truth of Reality (or of What Is).
    (c) Odinism was the outlook of the founders of our British race.
    (d) Our Odinists reverence British heroes, British holy places, British traditions, British ideals, before those of any other race.
    (e) The Odinist believes in the existence of his life beyond the immediate physical expression of it.
    (f) Odinists seek to be true to themselves and what is of them, and thus become better men for all the world.
    (g) The Odinist sees himself as a part, and his race as a greater part, of the life of Odin and the Great One.
    (h) Odinism teaches men their high duties to each other, to their race and to Odin.

    (NOTE: This pamphlet was written some time in the 1930s and was incorporated in Rud Mills’ The Odinist Religion: Overcoming Judeo Christianity, Melbourne: Ruskin Press, 1939. No doubt Mills would have worded it slightly differently if he were writing it today, yet that doesn’t detract from the pioneering nature of his thought.)

  2. Daniel McClymont says:

    You raise some good points about the diasporic Jewish intellectuals. Call me.

  3. Konrad says:

    The answer to our plight is inextricably linked to the comment from Osred (above). We must reject all conscious thought of this christian anachronism and forge ahead through re-linking with our ancestral beliefs.
    Western man has been dragged backwards for 1800 plus years. The very idea of Rome failed because of the acquiescence of its leaders from their founding ideals thus allowing their demise through miscegenation, use of slaves and tolerance towards religious fervour.
    We see the very same thing today – multi-racialism, decadence and disobedience to natures laws that is to our undoing.
    The Jerusalem declaration is a major step forward in the outright rejection of this false masquerade. The pseudo nationalists like Geert Wilders may consider themselves clever however one cannot create foundations upon falsehoods through befriending the enemy’s enemy.

  4. Balder says:

    Denmark: Leading members of ‘Nationalist’ party defends the right of Muslims and Jews to mark their children by genital mutikation.

    I’d like to add a terrible example of this pseudo nationalist alliance with world Jewry/Zionism. In Denmark, prime members of the Danish People’s Party , more specifically some those among them who identify as Christians are now the prime opponents to a ban on infant circumcision, and use a lot of energy writing articles in defense of the bloody practice, as well as trying to sell the idea of ‘Judeo-Christianity’. More here: Denmark: Politician from the patriotic philo-semitic Danish People’s Party supports genital mutilation of boys and girls

    Thsi party is now almost as big as the Social Democrats – but the immigration situation has only got worse during their time in parliament. A useless ‘Victory’…

  5. Terry says:

    Zionism is just Jewish nationalism. You can find left wing Israel hating Jews. Some Jews, some Greeks and dome Italians all support multiculturalism in Australia. The Jews are not unique in fact their sedition is far less than the Greeks.

  6. Wulfric says:

    Together we will awaken and help our people awaken.

    In time our people will see that we are correct – we have just as much right to exist as a racial group as those who seek to depose us.

    Our time will come, this is destiny.

    Wake up as many and as fast as possible, this really is a war.

  7. JoeQCitizen says:

    I’m afraid these thoughts about rejecting Christianity and embracing some kind of pagan norse gods is about as inspring as the circumcision knife to a 15 yr old boy!
    Appealing to ‘racial’ purity will land you all who follow this, on the scrap heap of historical irrelevance. Multi racialism is not the problem, multi VALUES ism is the problem. You will always remain a scrap of political flotsum in a backwater if you maintain these ideas. There is only one race..the Human race. People are equal, but creeds are not. I do agree though that a large majority of comfortable similar looking people is an asset to social harmony, but ‘white’ race? Good grief.. my white clan was almost beaten into genocidal oblivion by other white clans… and if you look at history you can see this has always been the case.
    King’s words “I have a dream that my children will one day live in a nation where they are no longer judged by the color of their skin, but the content of their heart” is relevant, but at the same time black militancy was never far away from his own movement and is manifest today in some sickening ways.

    The reclaim rally on April 4th demonstrated that many races can join hands and hearts in mutual support and goals. Limiting this to ‘white’ is a dead end street I’m afraid and will only leave you languishing in the corners of Aussie society and cut you off from much non white support. The goal of ‘Nationalism’ should be a fair go for all, and not for one skin color.

  8. admin says:

    Hello Joe,

    Your understanding seems to be based on a few false assumptions.

    Firstly, the idea that Nationalism seeks some “racial purity” is largely a strawman argument by anti-racists. In stating that we seek to obtain some 100% pure ideal, they think they can de-construct our entire argument by stating that it is technically infeasible. We don’t state such a thing so this argument is meaningless. We say that multiracialism is a poorer state of affairs than homogeneity, and that seeking multiracialism will make us all worse off. We should not shun white homogeneity, and indeed, should be open to white people who want to preserve it.

    Secondly, the MODERN discourse states that identity has nothing to do with ethnicity, while simultaneously stating that ethnic identity of people who aren’t white, (based on biology) is important. We think this is incorrect, and the fact that anti-racists have to constantly push hard to denounce this ideology is evidence of this. Why do anti-racists have to keep constantly reminding us that race doesn’t matter? If it truly didn’t matter to people, then they wouldn’t have to keep reminding us.

    Public demonstrations like Reclaim do show different peoples getting together, but what for? It is AGAINST something, Islam in particular. You can unite people against a common enemy, but having identity defined by opposition to a people, whether a race, or religion doesn’t make a good social order. What when you win? Then the common uniting factor is gone. Sure, there are Sri Lankans and Indians who may not like Islamification, but will they work with Australians of European heritage FOR something?

    When the common uniting factor in a society is a more organic ethnic/cultural heritage, then what unites people is something solid and unchangeable, their own being. If you unite people in opposition to something, or just based on principles, then this unity only exists as long as everyone still maintains those ideas, and that the fight against the enemy is maintained. Example: The USA and USSR were united fighting Germany during WWII. As soon as that ‘common foe’ left the scene, these two nations shortly thereafter were poised to annihilate each other.

  9. Peter Forde says:

    The utter ignorance – indeed evil ….

    Editors Note:
    Calling us “evil” from the start isn’t going to get your comment published…

  10. Peter says:

    I believe Israel should exist – so we can send the jews back there!

  11. Nicky Chow says:

    Don’t take the side of the Zionists or the other side

  12. admin says:

    @Nicky,

    That is pretty much what the Anti-Jerusalem Declaration is saying. Many who are critical of Islam, or who are “Conservatives” also seem to bat, strongly, for Israel, as if somehow it is the obligation of any one of us who wants to preserve our identity and civilisation, to take a hawkish pro-Israel stance. We disagree, and we disapprove of those who seem to treat it as more important that Israel remain Jewish, than Europe remaining white European.

    Likewise, we don’t take a side against Israel’s existence either, nor make demands that Israel cease being a Jewish state.

    We’ll leave that to those who have a strong vested interest in the matter. We don’t believe we do.

  13. Marckstaff says:

    Votre déclaration est pleine de bon sens. L’état criminel d’Israël est né d’une double imposture et le judaïsme politique a pour finalité la destruction de toutes les Nations .
    Salutations nationalistes de France .

  14. Peter Forde says:

    >I happened on your page (again) after literally forgetting all about yourselves about 4 years ago. Then I noted that i had written a comment, which had >been summarily censored because I used the word ‘evil’ in describing your viewpoints.

    >So now I have a question for yourselves: what difference have you made in the time of your existence?

    >And an observation. Over the past few years I have been listing activist groups and organisations who might be described as at least non-socialist – or >more-or-less conservative. Obviously you mob are ‘conservative’ given your desire to ‘conserve’ Australia.. Thus far I’ve collected about 150 names.

    NatAlt Note
    ++++++++++++

    You are *BANNED*.

    Note to commenters.

    You are free to comment and debate on our articles, provided it is genuine. No post is deleted because of their political views.

    Threats get you banned.
    Personal insults get you banned.
    Baseless accusations won’t see the light of day.

  15. Lazarus says:

    From Vox Popoli Blog:

    What the Alt Right is

    In the interest of developing a core Alt Right philosophy upon which others can build.

    The Alt Right is of the political right in both the American and the European sense of the term. Socialists are not Alt Right. Progressives are not Alt Right. Liberals are not Alt Right. Communists, Marxists, Marxians, cultural Marxists, and neocons are not Alt Right.
    The Alt Right is an ALTERNATIVE to the mainstream conservative movement in the USA that is nominally encapsulated by Russel Kirk’s 10 Conservative Principles, but in reality has devolved towards progressivism. It is also an alternative to libertarianism.
    The Alt Right is not a defensive attitude and rejects the concept of noble and principled defeat. It is a forward-thinking philosophy of offense, in every sense of that term. The Alt Right believes in victory through persistence and remaining in harmony with science, reality, cultural tradition, and the lessons of history.
    The Alt Right believes Western civilization is the pinnacle of human achievement and supports its three foundational pillars: Christianity, the European nations, and the Graeco-Roman legacy.
    The Alt Right is openly and avowedly nationalist. It supports all nationalisms and the right of all nations to exist, homogeneous and unadulterated by foreign invasion and immigration.
    The Alt Right is anti-globalist. It opposes all groups who work for globalist ideals or globalist objectives.
    The Alt Right is anti-equalitarian. It rejects the idea of equality for the same reason it rejects the ideas of unicorns and leprechauns, noting that human equality does not exist in any observable scientific, legal, material, intellectual, sexual, or spiritual form.
    The Alt Right is scientodific. It presumptively accepts the current conclusions of the scientific method (scientody), while understanding a) these conclusions are liable to future revision, b) that scientistry is susceptible to corruption, and c) that the so-called scientific consensus is not based on scientody, but democracy, and is therefore intrinsically unscientific.
    The Alt Right believes identity > culture > politics.
    The Alt Right is opposed to the rule or domination of any native ethnic group by another, particularly in the sovereign homelands of the dominated peoples. The Alt Right is opposed to any non-native ethnic group obtaining excessive influence in any society through nepotism, tribalism, or any other means.
    The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war.
    The Alt Right doesn’t care what you think of it.
    The Alt Right rejects international free trade and the free movement of peoples that free trade requires. The benefits of intranational free trade is not evidence for the benefits of international free trade.
    The Alt Right believes we must secure the existence of white people and a future for white children.
    The Alt Right does not believe in the general supremacy of any race, nation, people, or sub-species. Every race, nation, people, and human sub-species has its own unique strengths and weaknesses, and possesses the sovereign right to dwell unmolested in the native culture it prefers.
    The Alt Right is a philosophy that values peace among the various nations of the world and opposes wars to impose the values of one nation upon another as well as efforts to exterminate individual nations through war, genocide, immigration, or genetic assimilation.

    TL;DR: The Alt Right is a Western ideology that believes in science, history, reality, and the right of a genetic nation to exist and govern itself in its own interests.

    The patron saint of conservatives, Russell Kirk, wrote: “The great line of demarcation in modern politics, Eric Voegelin used to point out, is not a division between liberals on one side and totalitarians on the other. No, on one side of that line are all those men and women who fancy that the temporal order is the only order, and that material needs are their only needs, and that they may do as they like with the human patrimony. On the other side of that line are all those people who recognize an enduring moral order in the universe, a constant human nature, and high duties toward the order spiritual and the order temporal.”

    This is no longer true, assuming it ever was. The great line of demarcation in modern politics is now a division between men and women who believe that they are ultimately defined by their momentary opinions and those who believe they are ultimately defined by their genetic heritage. The Alt Right understands that the former will always lose to the latter in the end, because the former is subject to change.

  16. Max Van Matterhorn says:

    I am a white nationalist and I am not a Jew but my Great Great Grandmother was and I have a Jewish name.. am I to not join your movement? this is stupid, Jews historically were marxist hence your distaste for them but in this day and age there are many Jews around the world including in Israel with nationalist ideals who are just as white and just as European as anyone else. I have blue eyes and light brown hair, both my parents do too and I look more German than anything else and so do both my parents, my father is half German and half Irish, my mother northern Italian and is fairer than even my father. You are stupid if you think excluding Jews (who own half the world) is clever, nationalism and capitalism does not necessarily mean incompatibility. Donald Trump is a nationalist and he is a Capitalist, Europeans are distinguished for many things and one of them is their intellectual rigour and sophistication including their sophisticated technologies and economies. You included Rhodesia and I assume you mean Southern Africa’s former regimes too, well those regimes economies were growing at 8-10 percent per year… far more than any modernist economies could even dream of so tell me how is Nationalism incompatible with economics? You are the only people stopping your movement catching on the way Donald Trump made it spread with his great ideas. Stop holding yourselves back with crap and get a grip. You mentioned in the comments you believe it is not more important to remain pro Israel than pro European… why do you think being Pro Israel makes you anti European? why can’t you be Pro Israel and Pro European independance?

  17. admin says:

    We are not sure where you got the idea that a whiff of a Jewish sounding name in the family tree would make you persona non grata. This wasn’t stated in the declaration.

    The anti-Jerusalem Declaration is based on observation and practical reality. We observe that the overtly pro-Israel groups are anti-immigration groups. We aren’t strictly an anti-immigration group, we are a nationalist group. Our focus is our nation, not just acting as better bouncers at the borders and policing Muslims. Many anti-immigrant groups oppose our stance, oppose ethno-nationalism and would reject us for daring to restrict immigration to more than just trouble making Muslims.

    You state that Jews own half the world, but seem unaware of the very obvious problems that such an in-balance would cause. Jews certainly aren’t half the population, so what gives? You ask us why we can’t be Pro-Israel and Pro-European, but seem to lack the self-awareness to realise why the demand that we ‘take a side’ in the middle east should be our issue at all. We are obviously going to be Pro-European, but why should it be an issue if we are not actively Pro-Israel?

    This is ultimately what the Anti-Jerusalem Declaration is a declaration against. The requirement that people like us weigh in on, and bat for, Israel. There are always people who want to bring Israel into it. So what if there are Israeli Nationalists? There are also Tibetan Nationalists, Kurdish Nationalists, Basque Nationalists and so on all around the world. Why should Israel be treated as a special case?

    This is what we choose not to do.

    Perhaps you should read our latest article to get clarification on our philosophy.

  18. Max Van Matterhorn says:

    I will respond to those issues as concisely as possible. You said Jews owning half the world is a problem and although I think it would be better if perhaps there was more European ownership and equality but that in itself does not bother me. Why? because what someone else has does not mean I have more or less it just means they have a lot and secondly in my Ancestors country in Germany Jews have been living for over a thousand years and at this point a large amount of them especially those who own half the world have mixed so much with other Europeans that they are European and have blue eyes and blonde hair or brown hair just like me. I have not been circumsised because I am not a Jew neither are my parents or Grand Parents and I could not trace Jewish Linage until either my great grandmother or great great grandmother so it is quite a distance. If you are pro_European and you support colonial outposts like Rhodesia than surely you understand the benefits of forming allegiances and not making unnecessary enemies? Across the former colonial empires allies were formed as a method of control and because the colonial solution is also the humanitarian solution… lets be honest you can’t keep a straight face and say Angela Merkel or the government in Sweden is pro human rights when women are being raped and are victims of violence as a direct consequence of their refugee policies and this includes the immigrants themselves who are victims of this kind of ignorant hide the truth under the carpet culture. If you truly want nationalism to rule than you need to understand what is necessary to govern you can be friends with someone and still live separately and maintain your identity by even discouraging mixing. In Australia our longest serving and most famous Prime Ministers endorsed the White Australia policy. Who says Israel should be treated as a special case? I just think from a European perspective they are a key strategic ally in the middle east given so many of them have been in Europe for as I say over a thousand years and to that effect have become almost a part of the European landscape so they can be used to assert European dominance in the same way other groups were during colonial times and I believe natioanlism of those differing groups can co-exist under European nationalist leadership because quite frankly I consider Europeans to have no desire to cause harm to others but if you look at other groups evidence suggests the contrary and so they require limited management to ensure they don’t tear themselves or us to pieces. Having said that they should not be given aid and healthcare paid for by the West it should be primarily a economic partnership to make a profit not to subsidise those countries in the colonial sense of the world and to preserve culture like a museum piece. Back to the Jewish issue, you seem to think that being pro- European means you must dislike Jews, Europeans should be free to not mix with Jews or any other group to preserve their culture and there is nothing offensive about it contrary to media propaganda which endorses a rape culture of Europe but this does not mean it benefits Europe to ostracize Israel and isolate themselves of allies, the fact is yes it is True Germany did have a nationalist alliance in Palestine but this is not an endorsement it was only a necessary evil as the government saw it to do deals with lunatics for power like any other empire and this seems to be the only logical justfication for your stance. I see no reason why forming an alliance with a nationalist Israel is any less of an ideal given the greatest threat to Europe is from immigrants of Islamic descent and otherwise rather than Jews who are not engaging in rape and attempting to use the media to force sexual, economic, cultural and discursive submission of Western civilization through the education, media and government systems of institutions and through taxation.

  19. admin says:

    I think you missed the point of our reply. We are not against Israel. We are not looking to pick a fight with Jews.

    We’re tired of the siege mentality and the constant accusations of anti-semitism. When people constantly scream “You hate us” at you, you tend to just want to walk away. That is what we note tends to happen.

    That’s what you’re doing. From a position piece which stated nothing more than our stance that we aren’t going to engage in active pro-Israel activism, you’ve taken it as being against you. You cannot seem to accept that some people are neutral, or that some of us look at the overtly pro-Israel pandering that some groups do and decide that its not a strategy that worthwhile. You cannot accept that some European people just don’t have the passion about Jews that you do, or that they see Israel as another nation (which it is).

    The “Pro-Israeli” stance is probably just a ruse to deflect anti-semitism, or in the case of some Conservatives, a good way to display a strong anti-Islam bias.

    We’re not interested in that.

    We don’t have an interest in the Middle East and we’re not big on American interventionism. We’re not passionate about neo-conservative wars and strategically, there is little that Israel can do to stem the flow of migrants into Europe, which IS a concern. Strategic ally to do what? Bomb even more Arabs? Not our thing.

  20. Max Van Matterhorn says:

    Well “The Anti-Jerusalem Declaration” sounds anti Israel to myself but perhaps you meant something else. I am not taking it as anti me because I am not a Jew but I do not have any desire for harm towards Jews. Jews are people who I think can be strategically important. When I say strategically I am saying across the Arab and African nations there are millions of people who have anti Western hatred so it helps to know that sometimes they can have someone who stands up to them for the betterment of Western Civilisation and ensure Western interests are not neglected meaning women are not raped and both men and women are not bashed or murdered in any parts of the world. This is why strategic allies anywhere is beneficial just like in Rhodesia or other parts. I do not hate arabs but Isis and other groups of savages have been fighting the same barbary wars as pirates and savages for hundreds of years since the Tripoli War and in the United States if you read the declaration of independance they fought a nationalist revolution against many of the policies Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel espouse. I did not say anti-semitism I said I don’t understand firstly your title if you are neutral and secondly if you are not why you see something wrong with Western Civilization exercising authority to people who understand nothing else. I am not saying we should pick fights but if European people are under threat their should be consequences to those who think they can walk over the West.

  21. admin says:

    Thanks for your comment.

    The “Anti-Jerusalem Declaration” isn’t about taking a stance on Israel, whether pro or anti, but rather stating that the position that some Nationalists have, whereby they feel they HAVE to take a pro-Israel stance is flawed. We don’t believe that a pro-Israel stance will make Nationalism more palatable, or take heat off our movement, or make us more acceptable. It is essentially a call to disentangle the demographic and cultural issues that we face with the specific issues that Israel and Jews face. Some argue they two are interlinked, and part of one shared struggle. We don’t see it that way.

    While superficially they might appear similar, we believe that deep down there are fundamentally different mechanics. The fact that it is socially acceptable for example, for Jews to have an ethno-state and keep it that way, and for Whites its not. We have White Guilt, but not Jewish Guilt. We have to check White Privilege but not check Jewish Privilege. Anti-semitism lands you in court. Being anti-White lands you in a comfortable position at a University. These indicate that we’re actually facing different issues here.

    Many have argued that Jews may be strategic allies. We just haven’t seen empirical evidence for this, outside of opposing Islamism. If there are pro-White Jews, that’s great, and we wouldn’t stop any Jewish person or group from being pro-White. We just note it doesn’t really happen, and therefore the overt Israeli flag waving, extreme pro-Jewish positions we consider a waste of time.

    The Anti-Jerusalem declaration is a response to the Jerusalem Declaration that some populist groups in Western Europe drafted, whereby they announced their support of Israel, of Jews and how their struggle is ours. We don’t think this is a helpful strategy, and our declaration is to essentially say to Nationalists that this kind of approach isn’t of benefit to us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please enter CAPTCHA *